|
Post by juthi52943 on Jan 4, 2024 10:16:40 GMT
A given case without the authority itself having to impose additional measures. Any other aggravating or mitigating factors applicable to the circumstances of the case such as financial benefits obtained directly or indirectly from the breach or losses avoided The authority will take into account all circumstances not previously mentioned that may be relevant to the case including information on the financial benefits obtained. As a result of the infringement. The latter may be Job Function Email List particularly important for supervisory authorities as such benefits cannot be compensated by means that are not of a monetary nature. Therefore the fact that an entity has benefited from violating the Regulation may constitute a clear ground for imposing a financial penalty. A few words of summary. As you can see decisions on the amount of a specific penalty for violating the provisions of the GDPR are made after a very detailed analysis of the facts in each individual case. It is worth remembering that the proactive attitude of the entity involved in the violation is usually assessed to its benefit and may have a positive impact on the final penalty. For this reason even in.
|
|